The article now says that "fans asked Labrinth about the error" – I think that is in violation of WP:OR, which states: "Even with well-sourced material, if you use it to advance a position not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research". The point is, however, that we're not supposed to include our own interpretations.
I believe Labrinth knows perfectly well that "your" is indeed correct, and that he was just kidding when he wrote that it "was to annoy English teachers and grammar Nazis". IMO it's likely that he was just having fun with his followers/fans.
For all we know, Labrinth may have been drunk when he replied on Twitter. It's "your opinion, not supported by a reliable third party source", as you tell user:Wkwt above. Regarding your last sentence: That is your logic. Lil_ ℧niquℇ №1 16:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC) You're right that I should've chosen other words I'm sorry for not writing for instance "Before this edit" instead. Sometimes things need to be applied with a bit of logic, not every reference on every topic will explicitly say "X is Y". If Labrinth hadn't mentioned grammar or spelling then I'd accept that it was original research, but as it stands I don't accept that this is original research. If he had misspelled the word then it would be a grammar error. Labrinth responded using the term "Grammar Nazis", and so whilst I accept that neither Labrinth nor the editor of the article use the term "grammar error", it doesn't change the fact that the fans accused Labrinth of a grammar error. In the article, fans accuse Labrinth of misspelling "you're" by using "your" in the song's title. Nording ( talk) 05:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Your use of the words "socalled clarification" do not have have a sense of good faith about them. That claim is original research, as it is not directly supported by the source – it's your interpretation of the reply on Twitter. Lil_ ℧niquℇ №1 22:50, 23 December 2012 (UTC) Before your socalled clarification, the article said: "The title of the song contains a grammatical error". While your point above is sensible its your opinion, not supported by a reliable third party source. Therefore the article is perfectly covering the subject and there is no issue with integrity. He replied via the article and reference given. The passage reads that some fans accused Labrinth of writing a song with grammar errors.